|
|
| Only after Independence and re-organisation of the States was a semblance of real Government authority and administration brought into these far-flung areas. This was strongly resented by the newly educated elite of the tribal societies, who construed the efforts of the Government as an encroachment on their tribal way of life and freedom. Thus, on the basis of racial, cultural and religious differences from the majority stock of the plains, insurgency in the NE India came into being. |
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
An Indian militaryman's point of view
Thursday, January 22, 2009
Border Areas Of Manipur Still In A Time Wrap
| * |
| Bachaspatimayumin Sunzu contributed this article in the E-pao site. |
Manipur’s Aruna Devi wins Mumbai marathon, organisers ‘miss’ her
Manipur's Aruna Devi wins Mumbai marathon, organisers 'miss' her
Apparently, volunteers in charge of ushering the winners completely missed that an Indian — running with thousands of others from Africa, Europe and Asia — had run past the tape-line, and instead mobbed Indresh Dhiraj as the Indian winner a good five minutes after Aruna Devi should've been swooped upon for clinching the honours.
Officials don't deny that this blatant oversight could've been a result of volunteers — mostly college students from Mumbai — failing to recognise the 31-year-old Manipuri as an Indian, and mistaking her for a "foreign runner" owing to her North-east features.
Bruno Goveas from Procam International, the event's promoters, said, "It's likely that the volunteers confused her for a foreigner, so we missed her. There was a goof-up."
Aruna Devi, an Eastern Railway employee posted in Kolkata, said: "I knew I had won, but I had no energy left after finishing the race. Initially nobody came forward to offer water. Then one Didi (a volunteer) took me to resting room for athletes, and gave me a massage. When I felt all right I asked around, but I was told the medal-ceremony was over."
Besides not climbing the podium, Aruna Devi — running only her second full-marathon, and the first in Mumbai — also missed receiving the $2,500 prize-cheque in full view of the thousands of cheering spectators.
Officials, though terming the fiasco unfortunate, said they hadn't figured out how it happened. Adille Sumariwala, leading the technicals officials' team, said, "We always had the names right on our result sheets. I'm trying to find out how the mistake happened and I'll do a post mortem on the volunteers' actions. But there are so many agencies operating at the finishing line. Volunteers don't know all athletes by name and face, hence the confusion. She has got the cheque and medal now." Why the officials didn't notice that three different runners were escorted to the podium, remains unanswered.
Source: The Indian Express
Monday, January 12, 2009
Style over substance fallacy
Style over substance is a logical fallacy which occurs when one emphasises the way in which the argument is presented, while marginalising (or outright ignoring) the content of the argument. In some cases, the fallacy is employed as a form of ad hominem attack.
Here are some examples of the fallacy and how it is used.
Example One
* Person 1: Who needs a smoke detector? No one ever has a fire in their house, smoke detectors are a waste of money!
* Person 2: What?! You'd rather save a bit of money than ensure your family's safety? Don't you care whether they burn to death, you idiot?
* Person 1: I don't have to take your insults! Go away!
The fact that Person 2 insulted Person 1 does not alter the validity of Person 2's argument, nor does it excuse the hasty generalisation fallacy that Person 1 has employed.
Example Two
* Person 1: This website says that cars made by Ford get more miles to the gallon than cars made by Vauxhall.
* Person 2: That website is amateurish - look at the way it's designed! This other website is much more professional-looking, so it's probably more accurate.
The website Person 2 refers to may or may not be more accurate than the one that Person 1 was referring to. However, Person 2 is using the appearance of the first website alone to try and dismiss it as a reliable source of information, without properly analysing the content. This could also be considered a "Cum hoc ergo propter hoc" argument.
Example Three
Sometimes, outright non-responses or "stonewalls" are used as a part of style over substance. For example:
* Person 1: Communism by definition and practice is in direct conflict with the principles of Anarchy. How can you consider yourself to be an Anarchistic Communist?
* Person 2: "So Person 3, we should disband the government and make institutions that give money to the poor!"
* Person 3: "Yeah, no government is the best government, let's have those institutions control everything!"
Example Four
The baseless denial/unreasonable doubt is often an argumentative tool that accompanies circular reasoning, ad hominem or the no true Scotsman fallacy.
* Person 1: Candidate X has been skimming funds from the city! , I have receipts of his transactions and even photos taken of him drilling holes in the town safe!
* Person 2: Your receipts are faked! And for all what you know, he could have been cleaning the safe or that could have been a picture of his twin brother!
* Person 1: But Candidate X is the only boy in his family, and these were printed with the city's official seal!
* Person 2: That could have been planted there by Candidate X's opponents! They're known to be sneaky, because no true member of our party could do something like that!
Example Five
Stonewalling and mocking an unfamiliar concept, usually a form of equivocation.
* Person 1: Reverend X, you claim the end is coming because it's mentioned in your book "Diuretics", isn't that a bit of circular reasoning?
* Reverend X: (In a confused manner) You know what's circular reasoning? When the end comes, you'll be walking in circles trying to reason how you missed out on knowing the end came!
This may also be considered as a variety of a red herring fallacy.
Notes:
Logical fallacy:
A fallacy is a component of an argument which, being demonstrably flawed in its logic or form, renders the whole argument invalid (except in the case of 'begging the question' fallacy). In logical arguments, fallacies are either formal or informal. Because the validity of a deductive argument depends on its form, a formal fallacy is a deductive argument that has an invalid form, whereas an informal fallacy is any other invalid mode of reasoning whose flaw is not in the form of the argument.
Ad hominem
An ad hominem argument, also known as argumentum ad hominem (Latin: "argument to the man", "argument against the man") consists of replying to an argument or factual claim by attacking or appealing to a characteristic or belief of the source making the argument or claim, rather than by addressing the substance of the argument or producing evidence against the claim. The process of proving or disproving the claim is thereby subverted, and the argumentum ad hominem works to change the subject.
Hasty generalization
Hasty generalization is a logical fallacy of faulty generalization by reaching an inductive generalization based on insufficient evidence. It commonly involves basing a broad conclusion upon the statistics of a survey of a small group that fails to sufficiently represent the whole population.[1] Its opposite fallacy is called slothful induction, or denying the logical conclusion of an inductive argument (i.e. "it was just a coincidence").
Correlation does not imply causation
Correlation does not imply causation is a phrase used in the sciences and the statistics to emphasize that correlation between two variables does not imply that one causes the other. Its negation, correlation proves causation, is a logical fallacy by which two events that occur together are claimed to have a cause-and-effect relationship. The fallacy is also known as cum hoc ergo propter hoc (Latin for "with this, therefore because of this") and false cause. By contrast, the fallacy post hoc ergo propter hoc requires that one event occurs before the other and so may be considered a type of cum hoc.
No true Scotsman
No true Scotsman, or the self-sealing fallacy, is an ad hoc style fallacy of equivocation and question begging. It was advanced by philosopher Antony Flew in his 1975 book Thinking About Thinking – or do I sincerely want to be right?
Equivocation
Equivocation is classified as both a formal and informal fallacy. It is the misleading use of a term with more than one meaning (by glossing over which meaning is intended at a particular time).
It is often confused with amphiboly; however, equivocation is ambiguity arising from the misleading use of a word and amphiboly is ambiguity arising from misleading use of punctuation or syntax.
Red herring
Similar to ignoratio elenchi, a red herring is an argument, given in reply, that does not address the original issue. Critically, a red herring is a deliberate attempt to change the subject or divert the argument. This is known formally in the English vocabulary as a digression which is usually denoted as "red herring".
The term red herring comes from the time when criminals would use fish to lead sniffer dogs off the trail.
Tuesday, January 6, 2009
Henzoonaha
Long long ago, far away in a village remote
There lived a young boy, wild and free
People talks about him, his might and his strength
Henzoonaha was his beautiful name.
In a village not far away, there lived a young girl
Whose eyes sparkled like fireflies
Her hair as dark as night and as straight as Henzoos spears
Lairourembi was her maiden name.
Rumours spread in the village remote
People talked about a love affair
That of Henzoonaha and Lairourembis
'So divine and so true' they murmured.
Lairourembi was the bony and beautiful one
Henzoonaha was he- the son of a widow
And rumours had spread in the village, wide and far
'They are so much in love' thats what people said
On a day so bright, Henzoonaha behold his beloved
'I would come and meet you' he told his lady love
Wait for me in the night of 'lampta-thagja'
Well count the stars and watch the sun rise from the hill
They promised they would meet
On the dark and deep night of 'lampta-thangja'
The love-bound, the beautiful and the brave
-Henzoonaha and Lairourembi were their names.
The widow that his mother was, she wondered
'Why does my left eye flicker too much?'
'Is any evil looming around anywhere?'
'Oh dear crows- why do you crow so much?'
With motherly love in her eyes she had whispered
'Oh sweet brave child of mine, the night is so dark;
Remember, evils dwell in the dark and they feed on our souls
Tonight stay safe beside your old widow mother'
But, as the night got darker and deeper
To meet his dearly beloved Lairourembi
Stealthily Henzoonaha left the house;
In defiance of his mothers words.
To quench the thirst of his love
To fulfil the promise that was made
Of a meeting pure and divine
He stepped out in the deep dark night
Waiting in the cold and creepy silence
In the hollow shadows of the dark night
Were many voices and images unknown
Sharoi Ngaroi- were their evil names
The evil spirits chased Henzoonaha
Blocked his path and blinded his eyes
Voices and spirits followed him
Like shadow so hollow and ghostly
Henzonaha whispered Lairourembis name
His feeble voice assured 'I am coming to meet you'
Fought the spirits with his strength and might
And ran as fast he could towards his lady love
But so evil and cruel the spirits they were
They laughed at Henzoonahas plight
Took hold of his strong black hair
Pulled him down in the icy cold ground
Henzoonaha fought with the demons unseen
Oh the evils- they strangled his hands from behind
Chocked his heart and the spirits danced over his body
The body that was of Henzoonaha
Evils dispersed and died with the coming of the sun shine
But there lied in the eaves of his own house
The beautiful body that was of a widow's son
The body that was of beloved Henzoonaha
What a story evil and disastrous
Evil does exist, and they exist in the dark
They loom around for evil opportunity
Like a shadow, like a voice, like an image
In forms shapeless and deformed
In words, in actions, in thoughts
What a scary and interesting story it is
Evil does exist, and they get hold of you
When you least expect them
What a story evil and interesting
Learn a lesson if you must
Evil exist also in defiance and disobedience
What a story worth listening
Always heed advice that of the elders
In it lies the wisdom that will help fight the evils.
This piece was contributed by Yaiphabi Thoudam at e-pao.net.







