We’re in the News: Media Values with the Rise of the World Wide Web
A look into the changing nature of media and its values
The values they’re a-changin’
Two decades ago, we used to enjoy MTV and Channel V a lot but not anymore. Over the years, it changed to MTV India and further, AFAIK, became a reality TV channel. The unending Bollywood music 24×7 was becoming so allergic that one time, local cable TV swapped it with an Indonesian edition in my hometown! We would love to blame it as a qualitative loss but the ground realities tell a different story. According to television and audience surveys, MTV India has been achieving a growth in audience numbers at the rate of 8–10% annually. In fact, 2014 started at a high with an increase in viewership from 10 million GVMs (gross viewership in millions) in January to 15 million GVMs in July of the same year. Apparently, the new crops of viewers and their likes are more important for programme scheduling than those of the die-hard puritans.As of March 2019, according to Statista, a market and consumer data provider: Zing was the leading youth oriented television channel across India by far with almost 74.6 million weekly impressions from January 23 to January 29, 2021. MTV India (25.24) followed in popularity among youngsters in the country. E24 (7.24) and MTV HD+ (0.93) were in the third and fourth spots respectively. Source: Statista
This does not mean less people are getting hooked to music vis-à-vis media platforms; and rather it has only been a change in the medium. Like elsewhere, everything has become digital and if we go by the trend, the audience and reach of new pop, underground and independent music around the globe has increased manifold. The emergence of digital media has been ultradynamic. Personally, I prefer Earbits and AccuRadio to Spotify, YouTube, SoundCloud and ReverbNation but then it is only a personal choice and we are spoiled for choice.
‘The new obliterated the old. Railroads displaced wagons and canals—and then gave way to planes for long-distance travel. Cars eliminated buggies. Supermarket chains overwhelmed mom-and-pop groceries. Personal computers outmoded typewriters.’
It takes a global village
A piece on how in the metro media, particularly, the newspapers are eveningers in the town: On Reading National Evening Newspapers
However, these are the days of localisation, thanks to the e-revolution. Also, no media houses can afford to do without an online presence. Now the absence of geographical constraints has made mainland/metro media’s negligence as almost negligible. Now we can access, on one hand, the Washington Posts and the Guardians before we check the Imphal Free Presses and the Sangai Expresses. On the other, we have seen the advent of global newspapers and magazines in Indian and other local editions.
In 2009, the Press Information Bureau and the Ministry of Commerce & Industry issued a press release in this regard: in their own words, their priorities deal with how the union government would be allowing foreign investments in facsimile edition of foreign newspapers. It mentions that ‘the policy for foreign direct investment (FDI) in publication of facsimile edition of foreign newspapers include permitting 100% FDI with prior approval of the Government for the publication of the facsimile edition, provided the FDI is by the owner of the original foreign newspaper whose facsimile edition is proposed to be brought out in India. The policy also specified that, the publication can be undertaken only by an entity incorporated or registered in India under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956.’ (Source: Press Information Bureau)
To take a few examples in print and online media, amongst others, Fortune, Huffington Post, Forbes, Buzzfeed, The Economist, the Financial Times and The Wall Street Journal amongst others have their full-fledged Indian editions now. This course of media transformation has a two-sided consequence implying world-class publishers are hopefully taking interest in local stories for the impeccable news and views. However, it has been found that, on more than one occasion, the standard has fallen well below their former self-after localisation, with apparent disregard to the former quality of their global editions—just like MTV India did by catering to a dominant local population group, that is more inclined towards Bollywood, than doing it universally.
Again, another prominent feature is that even after years of this phenomenon, we are stuck in the sideline far away from the mainland, both literally and geographically—and this has resulted in fomenting the cause for one of the existential crises that has been drifting us apart from the global trends. In such a condition the rhetoric on information for growth and communication for development will be mere hokum. Apparently, we live in a parallel universe: the only difference is that we can see the wretchedness clearly in our backyards although we are stormed by glitters and blings and razzle-dazzles a minute after we move out of our homes.
In Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media, Edward S Herman and Noam Chomsky elaborated on the propaganda model of media. Their main contention is that the private interests in control of media outlets will shape news and information before it is disseminated to the public using the five information filters: (i) size, ownership, and profit orientation; (ii) advertising license to do business; (iii) sourcing mass media news; (iv) flak and the enforcers; and (v) anti-communism.
Certainly, capitalism has influenced ownership but new media has somehow counterbalanced the one-sided tilt. The rise of Edward Snowdens and Julian Assanges has proven that the top ranking of The Times of India and Hindustan Times in every poll survey are just a part of pop culture, while deeper inside us, we still care for sensibility and rationality. Now we also know it is far better to scan through the Guardians than sink into the various English tabloids to give an example.
No one can deny the loss of specialness in the media; and it has collectively become exclusive on another totally different platform. The exposure and mass publicity of local artists, the issues of local-is-more-important and the growing influence of local innovation have inherited a few positive tendencies. Never in history have we been able to access the amount of information; so is our power to choose and grasp the contents of global standard. Life has become easier too with much thanks to the world wide web.
—Concluded.
Image courtesy: All sourced from the Anonymous ART of Revolution
Read/Watch
- The Challenges of Democratizing News and Information: Examining Data on Social Media, Viral Patterns and Digital Influence, by John WihbeyShorenstein, Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard University
- An Animated Introduction to Noam Chomsky’s Manufacturing Consent and How the Media Creates the Illusion of Democracy by Al Jazeera
- Save the Internet, a campaign for net neutrality, Free Press
- The Revolution Will Not Be Televised by Gil Scott-Heron
Comments
Post a Comment